UX/PatternsLibrary - Revision history

Fifieldt: Reverted edits by Sohan.singh040 (talk) to last revision by Piet Kruithof

2016-12-22T06:23:42Z

Reverted edits by Sohan.singh040 (talk) to last revision by Piet Kruithof

Sohan.singh040: /* Patterns */

2016-12-20T02:15:30Z

‎Patterns

Piet Kruithof: /* Number of Clicks */

2015-06-23T21:13:48Z

‎Number of Clicks

Piet Kruithof: /* Number of Clicks */

2015-06-23T20:29:30Z

‎Number of Clicks

Piet Kruithof: /* Number of Clicks */

2015-06-23T20:28:55Z

‎Number of Clicks

Piet Kruithof: /* Number of Clicks */

2015-06-23T20:28:40Z

‎Number of Clicks

Piet Kruithof: /* Number of Clicks */

2015-06-23T20:27:59Z

‎Number of Clicks

Piet Kruithof: /* Number of Clicks */

2015-06-23T20:25:20Z

‎Number of Clicks

Piet Kruithof: /* Horizon Visual Specification */

2015-06-23T20:25:08Z

‎Horizon Visual Specification

Piet Kruithof: /* Number of Clicks */

2015-06-23T20:24:41Z

‎Number of Clicks

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:23, 22 December 2016
Line 34:		Line 34:

	== Patterns ==		== Patterns ==
−	~~Why UX design patterns work and how to use them.~~
−	First impressions are critical since users know within 10-20 seconds if they'll leave your site. Patterns communicate function and intent as clearly as possible within that window of opportunity.Here's how it works. Let's say a user wants to accomplish a task, like to book a hotel.
−
−	~~Take a look at a possible series of user actions:~~
−
−	~~A travel site presents the user with a list of possible places to stay.~~
−	~~The user taps the photo of a charming bungalow. Nothing happens. Lesson learned: Photos do not lead to more information about each property.~~
−	The user continues to explore. He or she may look for a "more info" link or tap on the nightly rate. They may try tapping the photo again, just in case. Left on their own, a determined user will continue to tap different elements in search of more information about the bungalow.
−	Finally, they tap the hotel name (perhaps presented as a button or link), and they're redirected to a more detailed page. The user sees a charming atmosphere but no complimentary breakfast. It doesn't fit their criteria, so they keep searching.
−	Now, here's where the pattern kicks in. Having learned that one thumbnail photo isn't tappable, but the hotel's name is, the user now knows exactly what to do.For more information [http://www.techved.com/uae/ux-design-agency Click here.]
−
	<br>		<br>

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:15, 20 December 2016
Line 34:		Line 34:

	== Patterns ==		== Patterns ==
		+	Why UX design patterns work and how to use them.
		+	First impressions are critical since users know within 10-20 seconds if they'll leave your site. Patterns communicate function and intent as clearly as possible within that window of opportunity.Here's how it works. Let's say a user wants to accomplish a task, like to book a hotel.
		+
		+	Take a look at a possible series of user actions:
		+
		+	A travel site presents the user with a list of possible places to stay.
		+	The user taps the photo of a charming bungalow. Nothing happens. Lesson learned: Photos do not lead to more information about each property.
		+	The user continues to explore. He or she may look for a "more info" link or tap on the nightly rate. They may try tapping the photo again, just in case. Left on their own, a determined user will continue to tap different elements in search of more information about the bungalow.
		+	Finally, they tap the hotel name (perhaps presented as a button or link), and they're redirected to a more detailed page. The user sees a charming atmosphere but no complimentary breakfast. It doesn't fit their criteria, so they keep searching.
		+	Now, here's where the pattern kicks in. Having learned that one thumbnail photo isn't tappable, but the hotel's name is, the user now knows exactly what to do.For more information [http://www.techved.com/uae/ux-design-agency Click here.]
		+
	<br>		<br>

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 23 June 2015
Line 23:		Line 23:

	* [http://www.measuringu.com/blog/seq10.php Single Ease Question (SEQ)] <br/>		* [http://www.measuringu.com/blog/seq10.php Single Ease Question (SEQ)] <br/>
		+
		+	* [http://www.lap.umd.edu/quis/ Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS)] <br/>
		+
		+	* [http://www.conetrees.com/2010/12/ux-glossary/post-study-system-usability-questionnaire-pssuq/ Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire Items (PSSUQ)] <br/>
		+
		+	* [http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/r_questionnaire.htm List of Standardized Questionnaires] <br/>

	== Components ==		== Components ==

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 * [http://www.uie.com/articles/three_click_rule/ Testing the Three-Click Rule] <br/>
-"If there is a scientific basis to the Three-Click Rule, we couldn't find it in our data. Our analysis left us without any correlation between the number of times users clicked and their success in finding the content they sought."
+"If there is a scientific basis to the Three-Click Rule, we couldn't find it in our data. Our analysis left us without any correlation between the number of times users clicked and their success in finding the content they sought."<br/>
 There are other ways to measure usability that correlate well with customer satisfaction.  For example, there are a number of standardized questionnaires that provide ratings for individual tasks or overall experience.

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 * [http://www.uie.com/articles/three_click_rule/ Testing the Three-Click Rule] <br/>
 "If there is a scientific basis to the Three-Click Rule, we couldn't find it in our data. Our analysis left us without any correlation between the number of times users clicked and their success in finding the content they sought."
-<Br>
 There are other ways to measure usability that correlate well with customer satisfaction.  For example, there are a number of standardized questionnaires that provide ratings for individual tasks or overall experience.

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 Articles:
 * [http://www.uxbooth.com/articles/stop-counting-clicks/ Stop Counting Clicks] <br/>
 "The 3-click-rule is the Freddy Kreuger of web design advice. You think it’s finally dead and then it comes back and starts slashing up sensible debate about usable design. I’m hoping to convince you to stop talking about the 3-click rule. I don’t mean substituting it with the 4-click rule or the 5-click rule. You should stop counting clicks as a measure of usability altogether."
@@ Line 21: / Line 20: @@
 "If there is a scientific basis to the Three-Click Rule, we couldn't find it in our data. Our analysis left us without any correlation between the number of times users clicked and their success in finding the content they sought."
 <br>
-<br>
+There are other ways to measure usability that correlate well with customer satisfaction.  For example, there are a number of standardized questionnaires that provide ratings for individual tasks or overall experience.
 == Components ==

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 * Community members should feel comfortable adding/editing this document. <br/>
 <br>
 We are specifically trying to reach a compromise between being too prescriptive and having a portal that has an inconsistent experience.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 We are specifically trying to reach a compromise between being too prescriptive and having a portal that has an inconsistent experience.
-==Number of Clicks==
+===Number of Clicks===
 A discussion around the numbers of clicks required to complete a task is appropriate because of the tendency to use it as a measure the efficacy of a design.  For example, arguing that a design requiring three clicks instead of four is always better for users.