Jump to: navigation, search

Obsolete:ArchitecturalOverview

Revision as of 20:05, 15 October 2010 by AnneGentle (talk) (Added bulleted list from Vish's mailing list post, will put the rest of the details in another page)

Architectural Overview for OpenStack Compute

Live Notes may be taken for this topic at: http://etherpad.openstack.org/Architecture

File:ArchitecturalOverview$overview.png

“Small” components, loosely coupled

  • Queue based (currently AMQP/RabbitMQ)
  • Flexible schema for datastore (currently Redis)
  • LDAP (allows for integration with MS Active Directory via translucent proxy)
  • Workers & Web hooks (be of the web)
  • Asynchronous everything (don't block)
  • Components (queue, datastore, http endpoints, ...) should scale independently and allow visibility into internal state (for the pretty charts/operations)

Development goals

  • Testing & Continuous Integration
  • Fakes (allows development on a laptop)
  • Adaptable (goal is to make integration with existing resources at organization easier)

Queue

  • Each worker/agent listens on a general topic, and a subtopic for that node. Example would be "compute" & "compute:hostname"
  • Messages in the queue are currently Topic, Method, Arguments - which maps to a method in the python class for the worker
  • exposed via method calls
    • rpc.cast to broadcast the message and not wait for a response
    • rpc.call to send a message and wait for the response

Datastore

  • Pre-Austin, data is stored in Redis 2.0 (RC)
  • Do the work on write - make reads FAST
    • maintain indexes / lists of common subsets
    • use pools (SETs in redis) that are drained for IPs instead of tracking what is allocated

Delta

  • Scheduler does not exist (instances are distributed via the queue to the first worker that consumes the message)
  • Object store in Nova is a naive stub which would be replaced with Cloud Files in Production (a simple object store that mimics Cloud Files might be good for development)
  • Tornado should be phased out for WSGI-based web framework

Networking

Currently, there are three strategies for networking, implemented by different managers:

  • FlatManager -- ip addresses are grabbed from a network and injected into the image on launch. All instances are attached to the same manually configured bridge.
  • FlatDHCPManager -- ip addresses are grabbed from a network, and a single bridge is created for all instances. A dhcp server is started to pass out addresses
  • VlanManager -- each project gets its own vlan, bridge and network. A dhcpserver is started for each vlan, and all instances are bridged into that vlan.

The implementation of creating bridges, vlans, dhcpservers, and firewall rules is done by the driver linux_net. This layer of abstraction is so that we can at some point support configuring hardware switches etc. using the same managers.